CORREA et al. V. ROBERTS et al. - Page 14





               Interference No. 105,019                                                                                                
               Correa v. Roberts                                                                                                       
               Lawson '278 are capable of being used to wrap around the edges of an undergarment                                       
               notwithstanding that that may not be the intended use of the flaps in Lawson '278.                                      
                       Regarding claim 14, party Roberts admits and does not dispute that the recited (1) "a                           
               liquid pervious topsheet," (2) "a liquid impervious backsheet joined with said top sheet," and (3)                      
               "an absorbent core positioned between said top sheet and said backsheet" are present or disclosed                       

               in the Lawson '278 reference. Claim 14 further recites: "at least one barrier element joined to                         
               said topsheet." Roberts admits and does not dispute that the Lawson '278 reference discloses a                          
               barrier cuff 62 joined to the topsheet 38 as shown in Figure 3. In that regard, we find that the                        
               barrier cuff 62 is a barrier element. Claim 14 further recites: "said barrier element having a                          
               proximal edge joined to said topsheet." Roberts admits and does not dispute that barrier cuffs 62                       
               of the Lawson '278 reference each has a proximal edge 64 joined to the topsheet. Claim 14                               
               further recites that the at least one barrier element has "a free edge spaced away from said                            
               proximal edge and being free from securement to at least a portion of said topsheet." Roberts                           
               admits and does not dispute that the distal edge 66 of the barrier cuff of the Lawson '278                              
               reference is spaced away from the proximal edge and that the Lawson '278 reference discloses                            
               that the distal edge 66 is preferably not secured to any element at least in the crotch region so that                  
               it may be spaced away from the top surface 40 of the topsheet 38. Claim 14 further recites: said                        
               at least one barrier element comprising an absorbent material for absorbing and containing body                         
               fluids which contact said barrier element." Roberts admits and does not dispute that the Lawson                         
               '278 reference discloses that the barrier cuffs may additionally be provided with absorbent means                       
               to absorb and contain exudates which contact the barrier buff. On that basis, we find that the                          
                                                              - 14 -                                                                   







Page:  Previous  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007