CORREA et al. V. ROBERTS et al. - Page 17





               Interference No. 105,019                                                                                                
               Correa v. Roberts                                                                                                       
               broadly as reasonably permitted, we take it to mean that the article is wom directly against the                        
               body of the wearer rather than separated therefrom by an undergarment. The absorbent article                            
               disclosed by the Lawson '278 reference satisfies this requirement.                                                      
                      Relying on the testimony of party Correa's own technical witness, party Roberts argues                           
               that while lateral flaps in sanitary napkins have the function of wrapping the sanitary napkin to the                   
               undergarment of the wearer, flaps in the context of diapers have the different function of                              
               gasketing structures and do not serve as ties. We have reviewed the cited testimony of Ms.                              
               Catherine E. Salerno (Exhibit 2008 on page 5, paragraph 9) and do not find that testimony                               
               sufficient to establish what party Roberts asserts. Ms. Salerno nowhere indicates that structural                       
               extensions which serve to tie the sanitary napkin to an undergarment are the only thing that can or                     
               should be refer-red to as a flap or lateral flap in the context of a sanitary napkin. Ms. Salerno also                  
               nowhere indicates that gasketing structures are the only thing that can or should be referred to as                     
               a flap or side flap in the context of a diaper. Ms. Salemo merely gave two examples of flaps in an                      
               absorbent article, one being a tie in a sanitary napkin and the other being a gasketing structure in a                  
               diaper. Her testimony does not establish that a "lateral flap" or "flap" in a sanitary napkin is                        
               necessarily a tie that wraps to an undergarment and cannot, in any instance, be a gasketing                             

               structure, or that a "side flap" or "flap" in a diaper is necessarily a gasketing structure and cannot,                 
               in any instance, be a tie. We take the term "flap" to have a meaning according to its ordinary                          
               usage in the English language, such as that defined in The Random House College Dictionary,                             
               Revised Edition (1982): "something broad and flexible, or flat and thin, that hangs loosely,                            
               attached at one side only." That meaning comports to and is consistent with the parties'                                
                                                              - 17 -                                                                   







Page:  Previous  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007