CORREA et al. V. ROBERTS et al. - Page 24





              Interference No. 105,019                                                                                              
              Correa v. Roberts                                                                                                     
                      Correa's claims 5 and 6 are reproduced below:                                                                 
                              5. Disposable intimate feminine absorbent according to claim 1, in which                              
                      said lateral cuff has between approximately 2% to around 35 % of the width of                                 
                      said absorbent core.                                                                                          
                              6. Disposable intimate feminine absorbent according to claim 1, in which                              
                      said lateral cuff has between approximately 5% to around 15% of the width of said                             
                      absorbent core.                                                                                               
                      Correa asserts, and Roberts admits, that none of Roberts' claims 14-16, 18-20, 22 and 23                      
              gives any indication of what the width of the lateral cuff should be, either in dimensions or in                      
              terms relative to the width of the absorbent core. Evidently, the requirement that the barrier cuff                   
              width must be within a certain range of the core width is the only difference asserted by Correa                      
              between its claims 5 and 6 and Roberts' claims as prior art. Regarding additional prior art which                     
              potentially may be combined with any claim of Roberts to arrive at Correa's claim 5 or claim 6,                       
              Correa cites to Patent No. 5,308,346 ("the "Sneller" reference), a reference disclosing a sanitary                    
              napkin invention which provides a raised barrier on the edges of side flaps to help control or                        
              prevent leakage and which specifies the width of the barrier element. Correa indicates that the                       
              barrier shown in Sneller has a width of about 15mm but dismisses this reference, however, on the                      
              ground that "it does not refer to any core width or state any ideal or preferred cuff width relative                  
              to the width of the core," and that "Sneller's drawings are not to scale and cannot be used to                        
              derive ratios of cuff width to core width." In short, Correa's position is that because Sneller does                  
              not specify the width of the core, it is not known whether the 15mm wide barrier is within 2% to                      
              35% of the width of the absorbent core as is recited in Correa's claim 5, or within 5% to 15% of                      
              the width of the absorbent core as is recited in CorTca's claim 6.                                                    
                                                             - 24 -                                                                 






Page:  Previous  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007