The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper 23 Filed by: Trial Section Merits Panel Mail Stop Interference Filed: P.O. Box 1450 February 20, 2004 Alexandria, VA 22313-1450 Tel: 703-308-9797 Fax: 703-305-0942 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES KEVIN B. McNEIL, LINDA R. SCHERZINGER, THOMAS A. HENSLER, REBECCA A. MILLER FAXED and BARBARA A. LUIDWIG, Junior Party, R6 2 0 2M (Patent 6,030,690), PAT & TM. OFFICE V. BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS ANDINTERFERENCES CAROL LEFEBVRE DU GROSRIEZ, PIERRE PROBST and PIERRE LAURENT, Senior Party, (Application 09/068,531). Patent Interference No. 105,169 Before: SCHAFER, TORCZON, and SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judges. SCHAFER, Adminstrative Patent Judge. JUDGMENT - RULE 602 LEFEBVRE DU GROSRIEZ filed a paper notifying the board that the involved application and patent are now commonly owned by the Georgia-Pacific Corporation and requested that the board tenninate the interference under 37 CFR § 1.602(a). Paper 19, p. 2. On February 5, 2004, an Administrative Patent Judge issued an order to show cause why, in view ofPage: 1 2 3 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007