the common ownership, judgment should not be entered against the junior party. Counselforthe
common owner has requested that judgment be entered against the senior party.
Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that judgment on priority as to the subject matter of Count I (Paper 1, p. 5),
is awarded against the senior party, CAROL LEFEBVRE DU GROSRIEZ, PIERRE PROBST
and PIERRE LAURENT;
FURTHER ORDERED that senior party, CAROL LEFEBVRE DU GROSRIEZ,
PIERRE PROBST and PIERRE LAURENT, is not entitled to a patent containing claims 22-69
(corresponding to Count 1) of Application 09/068,53 1;
FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this judgment be made of record in the file of
Patent 6,030,690 and in Application 09/068,531; and
FURTHER ORDERED that if there is a settlement agreement which has not been filed,
attention is directed to 35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and 37 CFR § 1.661.
9CHA'RI) E. SCHAFER
Administrative Patent Judge
Aza Z47ıı BOARD OF PATENT
AfCHARD TORCııN APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge INTERFERENCES
CAROL A. SPM-(TEL
Administrative Patent Judge
-2-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007