BAI et al v. LAIKO et al - Page 16




                Interference No. 104,745                                                                                                 

                regions of atmospheric pressure.  See, e.g., Bai Specification at 1, ll. 13-15 ("The invention                           
                relates to the field of mass spectrometry, and more particularly, to a matrix-assisted laser                             
                desorption ionization (MALDI) source for mass spectrometry at about atmospheric pressure.").                             
                Consequently, we hold                                                                                                    
                that the term "atmospheric-pressure" is entitled to weight and that the Bai count alternative                            
                therefore is limited to an apparatus for generating analyte ions in a region of atmospheric                              
                pressure.16                                                                                                              
                        Turning now to the meaning of "atmospheric-pressure," the term "atmospheric pressure"                            
                is defined as "[t]he pressure at any point in an atmosphere due solely to the weight of the                              
                atmospheric gases above the point concerned."  McGraw-Hill Dictionary 147.  The term is also                             
                used to refer to "an exerted pressure of 1 atmosphere," which is a unit of pressure equal to                             
                1.01325 x 105 newtons per square meter.  The American Heritage Dictionary of the English                                 
                Language 83 (New College Edition, 1975).  These standard definitions do not imply that the                               
                atmospheric-pressure region is defined by or located within an enclosure.  Nor does Laiko so                             
                contend.  Instead, Laiko cites Bai's specification in support of  this conclusion.  However,                             


                16  This interpretation of the preamble of the Bai count alternative accordingly is consistent                           
                with the construction of the preamble of Bai claim 41 in the Motions Decision, at 8-9:                                   
                        The determination of whether preamble recitations are positive limitations "can be                               
                        resolved only on review of the entirety of the patent to gain an understanding of                                
                        what the inventors actually invented and intended to encompass by the claim."                                    
                        Corning Glass Works v. Sumitomo Elec. U.S.A., Inc., 868 F.2d 1251, 1257,                                         
                        9 USPQ2d 1962, 1966 (Fed. Cir. 1989).  Accordingly, we look to Bai's                                             
                        specification in order to properly interpret Bai claim 41.                                                       
                                . . .Thus, Bai claim 41, when interpreted in light of the Bai specification,                             
                        positively recites an apparatus capable of atmospheric-pressure ionization.                                      
                                                                 - 16 -                                                                  





Page:  Previous  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007