STICE et al v. CAMPBELL et al - Page 33



          Interference 104,746                                    Paper 124           
          Stice v. Campbell                                                           
               In view of the discussion Decision on Priority, Paper 123,             
          it is:                                                                      
                    ORDERED that adverse judgment as to priority with                 
          respect to counts 4, 5, and 6 is entered against Stice;                     
                    FURTHER ORDERED that Steven L. Stice, Jose Cibelli,               
          James Robl, Paul Golueke, F. Abel Ponce de Leon, and D. Joseph              
          Jerry are not entitled to a patent containing claims 1–24 of U.S.           
          Patent 5,945,577;                                                           
                    FURTHER ORDERED that this paper be given an appropriate           
          number and placed in the patent file of U.S. Patent 5,945,577 and           
          in the application file of 09/650,194.                                      















                                         -2-                                          




Page:  Previous  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007