The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ROBERT H. MOFFETT
____________
Appeal No.2003-1274
Application No. 09/802,712
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before KIMLIN, KRATZ and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING
This is in response to appellant’s request for rehearing of
our decision mailed August 19, 2003, wherein we affirmed the
examiner’s decision to reject claims 1, 3, 4, 9 and 14 under
35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Davis in view of
Chung and to reject claims 10 and 16 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over Davis in view of Chung and Keys.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007