Appeal No. 2003-1274
Application No. 09/802,712 Page 6
presented, makes plain the unsoundness of the arguments
presented.
After reconsideration in light of appellant’s request, we
find that our decision is free of substantive factual and legal
error, and we remain of the opinion that the claimed subject
matter would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the
art within the meaning of § 103(a) in view of the prior art cited
by the examiner.
CONCLUSION
Appellant’s request is granted to the extent we have
reconsidered our decision, but is denied with respect to
making any change therein.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007