The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 27
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte STEPHEN BRIANCOURT
____________
Appeal No. 2004-0077
Application No. 09/674,681
____________
HEARD: February 17, 2004
____________
Before ABRAMS, FRANKFORT, and STAAB, Administrative Patent Judges.
ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING
The appellant has filed a paper captioned “Request for Clarification of Decision
on Appeal,” in which he requests that we confirm the interpretation we gave to the
phrase “angularly variable pivot axis” in our decision of March 8, 2004, wherein we
reversed the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-7, 10-14 and 17-20. We have
designated this paper to be a request for rehearing.
GRANTED.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007