Ex Parte Briancourt - Page 2




             Appeal No. 2004-0077                                                              Page 2                
             Application No. 09/674,681                                                                              


                                                  BACKGROUND                                                         
                    The appellant’s invention relates to a an aircraft landing gear.  An understanding               
             of the invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claim 1, which appears in                   
             the appendix to the Brief.  All of the claims were rejected by the examiner under 35                    
             U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Lucien U.S. Patent No. 2,982,500, issued                        
             May 2, 1961.                                                                                            
                    As we stated in our decision, the appellant’s invention is directed to a                         
             mechanism for pivotally retracting and extending the landing gear of an aircraft which                  
             causes the landing  gear to move along an essentially arcuate path upon retraction in                   
             such a manner as to clear obstacles in the restricted space in which it must be                         
             operated.  According to the claims, this is accomplished by causing the pivoting                        
             retraction movement of the leg of the landing gear to occur about “an angularly variable                
             pivot axis.”  A key issue in evaluating the patentability of the claims resided in the                  
             interpretation to be given to this phrase, and it formed the basis for our reversal of the              
             examiner’s rejection over the Lucien reference.                                                         
                    In this regard, on page 4 of our decision, with reference being made to the                      
             drawings and to the explanation in the specification of the preferred embodiments, we                   
             interpreted the phrase “angularly variable pivot axis” to mean that “[t]he angle of the                 
             pivot axis with respect to point 19 varies as link 30 pivots about point 33, that is, the               
             pivot axis orientation after retraction is not parallel to the pivot axis when the gear is in           








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007