Ex Parte Bailey et al - Page 1



          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was                   
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the                  
          Board.                                                                           
                                                                Paper No. 30               
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                           
                                        __________                                         
                           BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                              
                                    AND INTERFERENCES                                      
                                        __________                                         
                   Ex parte RICHARD F. BAILEY Sr., RONALD A. FISHER                        
          and STEVEN M. HOFFBERG                                                           
                                        __________                                         
                                  Appeal No. 2004-0251                                     
                                 Application 09/853,097                                    
                                       ___________                                         
                                 HEARD: January 6, 2004                                    
                                       ___________                                         
          Before COHEN, FRANKFORT, and PATE, Administrative Patent Judges.                 
          FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                          

          ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING                                                         

                This is in response to appellant’s request for rehearing of                
          our decision mailed February 26, 2004, wherein we affirmed, inter                
          alia, the examiner's rejection of claims 127 through 130, 134,                   
          137, 138 and 143 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by                
          Gross, and that of claims 68, 69, 72 through 75, 127 through 130,                
          134, 137, 138 and 143 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being                          
                                             1                                             




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007