Ex Parte Bailey et al - Page 4



          Appeal No. 2004-0251                                                             
          Application 09/853,097                                                           

          subsequently over a dynamic characteristic of the enclosed                       
          space/bladder.  Appellant’s assertion that the broad language of                 
          claim 127 requires simultaneous control over two independent                     
          characteristics of the footwear, and that such characteristics                   
          must be controllable at any time, attempts to read too much of                   
          the specification into the claim, and is simply beyond the                       
          broadest reasonable interpretation of the disputed language in                   
          claim 127.1                                                                      

          On page 8 of the request, appellant asserts that control of                      
          relief pressure and cushioning effected by control of the flow                   
          rate of water from a bladder (205) in Demon’s footwear does not                  
          correspond to damping. We do not agree.  As noted in column 4,                   
          lines 11-13, the fluid valve (210) associated with each of the                   
          fluid bladders in the footwear of Demon is adjustable over a                     
          range of openings (i.e., variable metering) to control the flow                  
          of fluid exiting a fluid bladder, which release of fluid from the                
          bladders reduces the impact of the user’s foot upon the traveling                

                1 While appellant has indicated, on page 3 of the request,                 
          that chapters 1 and 17 of Elements of Computer Process Control                   
          were provided with the request, we note that no such documents                   
          were attached when the request was Faxed to the USPTO on April                   
          26, 2004.                                                                        
                                             4                                             




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007