Ex Parte Deacon et al - Page 2




             Appeal No. 2003-1272                                                              Page 2               
             Application No. 10/039,338                                                                             



                    We AFFIRM and enter a new rejection pursuant to 37 CFR § 41.50(b).                              
                                                 BACKGROUND                                                         
                    The appellants' invention relates to detachable cleats or "spikes" for golf shoes               
             which are suitable for winter play (specification, p. 1).  A copy of the claims under                  
             appeal is set forth in the appendix to the appellants' brief.                                          


                    In parent Application No. 08/149,193, a panel of this Board rendered a decision                 
             on March 23, 2001.2  In that decision, that panel (1) affirmed the rejection of claims 119             
             and 132 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, as being based upon a specification                    
             which does not descriptively support the claimed invention; (2) reversed the rejection of              
             claims 113 through 138 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, as being indefinite;                   
             (3) reversed the rejection of claim 134 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by               
             Jordan, Jr. (Jordan)(U.S. Patent No. 3,583,082); (4) reversed the rejection of claims 113              
             through 119, 121, 123 through 130, and 132 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                              
             unpatentable over Jordan; (5) reversed the rejection of claims 120, 133, and 135 under                 
             35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Jordan in view of Zaleski (U.S. Patent No.                  
             2,491,596); and (6) reversed the rejection of claims 122, 131, and 136 through 138                     

                    2The panel consisted of Administrative Patent Judges Cohen, Staab and Bahr.                     
             Administrative Patent Judges Cohen and Staab have now retired from the Board.                          









Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007