Appeal No. 2003-2074
Application No. 09/095,325
message do not specifically disclose a first address at or
associated with a host system to be used with the mobile client”
(Paper No. 25-page 4).
Specifically with regard to claims 104, 105, and 109-114,
the examiner is concerned with the language describing that upon
receiving a reply message at a forwarding component associated
with a host system, forwarding the received message. The
examiner explains that while the specification, at page 15, line
20 through page 16, line 11, describes forwarding a sent message
to a mobile client, and, at page 20, line 21 through page 21,
line 32, describes sending the reply message, the description
only relates to the host system sending messages to the client,
but not sending messages in the reverse direction, and to a
client controller optimizing the reply message by calculating a
difference using a delta routine between the reply message and
the preceding message, the client then sending the reply message
to the host system. However, the examiner contends, there is no
disclosure of a forward component to forward messages in the
specification; i.e., forwarding messages to the mobile client and
sending the reply to the message sender do not specifically
disclose a forward component to the host system to forward
messages.
-5-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007