Appeal No. 2003-2074
Application No. 09/095,325
and drawing provide support for the claimed “continuously
forwarding” feature.
Thus, we will not sustain the rejection of claims 33-55, 64,
66-103, and 106-108 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph.
Accordingly, the examiner’s decision rejecting claims 33-114
under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, as relying on an
inadequate written description is reversed.
With no rejections left outstanding in this case, the
examiner may wish to take up appellants’ request regarding an
interference, as the examiner notes at page 6 of Paper No. 25
REVERSED
JAMES D. THOMAS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
ERROL A. KRASS ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
STUART S. LEVY )
Administrative Patent Judge )
EK/RWK
-12-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007