Ex Parte Spruit et al - Page 13



          Appeal No. 2004-0779                                                        
          Application No. 09/790,185                                Page 13           

                                     CONCLUSION                                       
               To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claims            
          1 and 7 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) is reversed.  The decision of              
          the examiner to reject claims 2-4 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) or in            
          the alternative under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) is reversed.  The                  
          decision of the examiner to reject claim 5 under 35 U.S.C.                  
          § 103(a) is reversed.  A New Ground of Rejection of claims 1-5              
          and 7 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, has been entered             
          under 37 CFR 41.50(b).  37 CFR § 41.50(b) also provides that the            
          appellant, WITHIN TWO MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF THE DECISION, must            
          exercise one of the following two options with respect to the new           
          ground of rejection to avoid termination of the appeal as to the            
          rejected claims:                                                            
                    (1) Reopen prosecution.  Submit an appropriate                    
               amendment of the claims so rejected or new evidence                    
               relating to the claims so rejected, or both, and have                  
               the matter reconsidered by the examiner, in which event                
               the proceeding will be remanded to the examiner. . . .                 













Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007