Appeal No. 2004-0823
Application No. 09/555,391
10. Claims 33-35 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over the
combination of Fang and Novik in view of Aravind.
11. Claim 36 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over the
combination of Fang and Novik in view of Aravind and Demos.
12. Claim 37 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over the
combination of Fang and Novik in view of Ghaderi.
13. Claims 38, 44, 47, 48 and 51-53 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over the combination of Ohhashi and Novik in view of Aravind.
14. Claim 54 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over the
combination of Ohhashi and Novik in view of Aravind and Golin.
15. Claims 46 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over the
combination of Ohhashi and Novik in view of Aravind and Yogeshwar.
16. Claims 38-44 and 48 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable
over the combination of Ohhashi and Novik in view of Albanesi.
17. Claims 55 and 56 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over
the combination of Ohhashi and Novik in view of Cantoni and Aharoni.
18. Claims 55-59 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over
the combination of Ohhashi and Novik in view of Chong.
19. Claims 60-62 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by the
disclosure of Novik.
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007