Ex Parte BAGNI et al - Page 1




             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for                    
                   publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                      
                                                                                     Paper No. 30              
                            UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                          
                                                ____________                                                   
                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                             
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                                ____________                                                   
                              Ex parte DANIELE BAGNI and GERARD DE HAAN                                        
                                                ____________                                                   
                                            Appeal No. 2004-0907                                               
                                          Application No. 09/192,674                                           
                                                ____________                                                   
                                                  ON BRIEF                                                     
                                                ____________                                                   
             Before BLANKENSHIP, SAADAT, and MACDONALD, Administrative Patent Judges.                          
             BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                         




                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                   This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final                
             rejection of claims 1-9, which are all the claims in the application.                             
                   We affirm.                                                                                  














Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007