Appeal No. 2004-1128
Application No. 10/099,121
that "[a]ppellant concedes solely for purposes of limiting the
issues on appeal that claims 7 and 14 stand and fall with the
independent claims." No arguments have been proffered as to the
combinability of Kisor with Archive97, Kahle, and Fehskens for
claims 5 and 12. Thus, the only arguments we have before us as
to claims 1, 3 through 8, and 10 through 15 are those directed to
the rejection of independent claim 1. Therefore, in accordance
with 37 C.F.R. § 1.192(c)(7), which was in effect at the time of
the Brief, we will treat claims 1, 3 through 8, and 10 through 15
as a single group, with claim 1 as representative, and claims 2
and 9 as a second group, with claim 2 as representative.
We have carefully considered the claims, the applied prior
art references, and the respective positions articulated by
appellant and the examiner. As a consequence of our review, we
will affirm the obviousness rejections of claims 1 through 15.
The examiner asserts (Answer, pages 4-5) 1) that page 9 of
Archive97 shows the January 26, 1997, version of www.archive.org,
which allows people to visit archived versions of Web sites,
2) that page 11 shows the dialogue box that appears after
clicking on "The Libertarian Web" at line 21 of page 9, and
3) that page 12 shows the URL for "The Libertarian Web." The
examiner concludes that the URL includes a time-stamp because it
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007