Appeal No. 2004-1128
Application No. 10/099,121
Therefore, Shnelvar satisfies the limitation of claims 2 and 9,
with Wlaschin being merely cumulative. Therefore, we will
sustain the rejection of claims 2 and 9 over Archive97, Kahle,
Fehskens, Shnelvar, and Wlaschin.
CONCLUSION
The decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1 through 15
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a)(1)(iv).
AFFIRMED
LEE E. BARRETT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
ANITA PELLMAN GROSS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
AGP/rwk
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007