Appeal No. 2004-1443
Application No. 09/559,695
We will not sustain the examiner’s rejection of
independent claim 10 or of claims 11-17 which depend therefrom
for the reasons argued by appellants in the briefs. The
examiner’s rejection of claim 10 and response to appellants’
arguments treat claim 10 as if it is the same as claim 1. As
noted by appellants, however, claim 10 is substantially different
from claim 1, and the examiner has failed to address the specific
limitations of claim 10 or respond to appellants’ specific
arguments directed to claim 10.
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007