Appeal No. 2004-1463 Application 09/401,221 cannot happen in Brendel. Therefore, the examiner’s analysis in support of the combination of Brendel with Leighton is not based on anything within the teachings of these references. The examiner, therefore, is simply trying to reconstruct the claimed invention in hindsight. In summary, the examiner’s rejection of the claims on appeal is not supported on the record before us. Therefore, the decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1-6 is reversed. REVERSED JERRY SMITH ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO ) BOARD OF PATENT Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) LANCE LEONARD BARRY ) Administrative Patent Judge ) -8-Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007