The opinion in support of the decision being
entered today was not written for publication
and is not binding precedent of the Board.
_______________
Paper No. 26
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
Ex parte MARK L. SKARPNESS
and NIRANJAN PARAMPALLI
Appeal No. 2004-1676
Application 09/263,9181
ON BRIEF
Before KRASS, BARRETT, and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges.
BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from
the final rejection of claims 1, 4, 5, and 7-16.
We affirm.
1 Application for patent filed March 5, 1999, entitled
"Method for Interfacing an ATM Network to a PC by Implementing
the ATM Segmentation and Reassembly Functions in PC System
Software."
- 1 -
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007