Ex Parte TSAI - Page 3





                 Appeal No. 2004-1890                                                                                         3                  
                 Application No. 09/225,974                                                                                                      



                         Claims 1, 11, and 18 stand finally rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second                                               

                 paragraph, as failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the invention.1  Claims                                    

                 58-62 stand finally rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated by Carey.                                            

                 Claims 1-3, 5-18, 63-75, 79-86 and 95-97 stand finally rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)                                        

                 as being unpatentable over Carey in view of Suver.  In a separate rejection under                                               

                 35 U.S.C. § 103(a), claims 95-97 stand finally rejected as being unpatentable over Carey                                        

                 alone.                                                                                                                          

                         Rather than reiterate the arguments of Appellant and the Examiner, reference is                                         

                 made to the Briefs2 and Answer for the respective details.                                                                      

                                                                    OPINION                                                                      

                         We have carefully considered the subject matter on appeal, the rejections advanced                                                                                                              

                 by the Examiner, the arguments in support of the rejections and the evidence of                                                 

                 anticipation and obviousness relied upon by the Examiner as support for the prior art                                           

                 rejections.  We have, likewise, reviewed and taken into consideration, in reaching our                                          



                         1 Although the Examiner has characterized the stated position with regard to the language of                            
                 claims 1, 11, and 18 as an “objection,” we agree with Appellant (Brief, pages 9, 12, and 13; Reply Brief,                       
                 page 4) that the Examiner’s position is properly characterized as a “rejection.”  The Examiner’s comments                       
                 (Answer, page 15) regarding an alleged “lack of antecedent basis” in the language of claims 1, 11, and 18                       
                 verifies that the asserted inadequacies of the claim language are a matter of substance, not mere                               
                 formalities.  The alleged indefiniteness of claim language is properly characterized as a “rejection” which is                  
                 reviewable by the Board.  See MPEP § 706.01.                                                                                    
                         2 The Appeal Brief was filed August 18, 2003 (Paper No. 28).  In response to the Examiner’s                             
                 Answer dated October 16, 2003 (Paper No. 29), a Reply Brief (corrected) was filed December 23, 2003                             
                 (Paper No. 31), which was acknowledged and entered by the Examiner as indicated in the communication                            
                 dated April 1, 2004 (Paper No. 33).                                                                                             








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007