Ex Parte Jacobson et al - Page 12


         Appeal No. 2004-1912                                                       
         Application No. 09/808,584                                                 

         application by the conveyor as required by claim 1.  Brief, page           
         9.                                                                         
              In response, the examiner argues that Shiraishi teaches a             
         blade or metering bar positioned against the applicator 5.  The            
         examiner states the control of the amount of coating material              
         applied to the applicator, and then to the article, results from           
         the metering bar or blade 7 removing left-over applied coating.            
         The examiner states that the blade or metering bar 7 prevents              
         the combination of excess of applied coating material and                  
         freshly applied coating material from building up, to provide              
         different thickness of coating to each subsequently fed article.           
         Answer, pages 14-15.                                                       
              We cannot find in Shiraishi disclosure that indicates that            
         the metering bar 7 prevents the combination of an excess of                
         applied coating material and freshly applied coating material              
         from building up, to provide a different thickness of coating to           
         each subsequently fed article.  Item 7 is an bending blade held            
         against the rubber roll 5 for bending the rubber roll 5                    
         arcuately, to create a progressively varying gap between sheet 1           
         of glass and the rubber roll 5, and a conveyor 8 disposed                  
         underneath the rubber roll for feeding the sheet glass 1 in the            
         direction as indicated by arrow A in Fig. 1, across the rubber             
         roll 5.                                                                    
              As shown in Fig. 2, the rubber roll 5 is flexed to an                 
         arcuate shape complementary to the bending blade 7 until one               
         axial end 5a thereof is held in direct contact with the sheet 1            
         of glass remotely from a longitudinally edge 1a thereof.  See              
         col. 3, lines 18-23.  The gap between sheet 1 of glass and the             
         rubber roll 5 is therefore progressively smaller or tapered in             


                                         12                                         


Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007