Appeal No. 2004-1912
Application No. 09/808,584
III. The 35 U.S.C. § 103 rejections
Rather than discuss each rejection and the respective
reference(s) applied in a particular 35 U.S.C. § 103 rejection,
we simply refer to our discussion made above in connection with
the same references utilized in the anticipation rejections.
That is, for the same reasons that the references of Schäfer
‘256, Schäfer ‘620, Knain, Schrauwers, and Shiraishi each fail
with regard to establishing a prima facie case of anticipation,
we determine that these references also fail with regard to a
prima facie case of obviousness.
In view of the above, each of the 35 U.S.C. § 103
rejections is reversed.
IV. Conclusion
Each of the rejections is reversed.
15
Page: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007