The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte SHIGEYUKI MARUYAMA and HIROHISA MATSUKI ____________ Appeal No. 2004-1914 Application No. 09/739,288 ____________ HEARD: February 8, 2005 ____________ Before DIXON, BLANKENSHIP, and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges. BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-4 and 14-20, which are all the claims remaining in the application. We affirm.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007