The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 21 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte DAVID BRANDOW, JOHN M. CHILDS, ROBERT D. CLOSE, J. Y. ERIC GIGUERE and GENO COSCHI ____________ Appeal No. 2004-2155 Application No. 09/562,641 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before BARRETT, BARRY, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges. LEVY, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1-34, which are all of the claims pending in this application. BACKGROUND Appellants' invention relates to a Java-based database access object referred to as a Java DataWindow. The Java DataWindow includes both client-side and server-side components.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007