Appeal No. 2004-2250 Application No. 09/542,154 (filed Mar. 10, 1999) Gerba et al. (Gerba) 6,492,997 Dec. 10, 2002 (filed Jun. 24, 1998) Kikinis 6,625,126 Sep. 23, 2003 (filed Jul. 12, 1999) Claim 30 stands rejected under the second paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 112 as being indefinite. Claims 1, 2 and 30 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Brown, Kikinis, Namma and Humpleman. Claims 3 and 28 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Brown, Kikinis, Namma, Humpleman and further in view of Shuping. Claim 4 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Brown, Kikinis, Namma, Humpleman and further in view of Barnett. Claims 5-7, 10, 12-15, 27 and 31 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Brown, Kikinis, Namma, Humpleman and further in view of Gerba. Claims 8 and 16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Brown, Kikinis, Namma, Humpleman, Gerba and further in view of Nielsen. Claim 9 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Brown, Kikinis, Namma, Humpleman, Gerba and further in view of Anderson. 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007