Appeal No. 2004-2267 Page 10
Application No. 09/651,184
Here, the examiner does not allege, let alone show, that the addition of Durst
cures the aforementioned deficiency of Nori. Absent a teaching or suggestion of
reviewing time stamps corresponding to the names of data files stored in a temporary
directory to determine if a predetermined time delay has passed and, if so, generating
commands to remove data files from the temporary directory, we are unpersuaded of a
prima facie case of obviousness. Therefore, we reverse the obviousness rejection of
claims 4, 11, 12, and 22.
CONCLUSION
In summary, the rejection of claims 1-3, 5-10, and 13-21 under § 102(b) is
reversed. the rejection of claims 4, 11, 12, and 22 under § 103(a) is also reversed.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007