The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte NIGEL D. YOUNG
_____________
Appeal No. 2004-2288
Application No. 10/084,723
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before PAK, WARREN, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final
rejection of claims 1 through 13. Claims 14 and 15, the only
other claim pending in the above-identified application, were not
rejected by the examiner. We have jurisdiction pursuant to
35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 134.
Claims 1 and 2 are representative of the subject matter on
appeal and read as follows:
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007