Ex Parte Migliorini et al - Page 23




                      Appeal No. 2004-2292                                                                                                        
                      Application 09/747,537                                                                                                      

                      WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge, Concurring-in-part and Dissenting-in-part:                                             
                      I concur with the panel’s decision to affirm the decision of the examiner for the                                           
                      following reasons.                                                                                                          
                              In order to review the eight grounds of rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) on                                       
                      appeal (see above pp. 2-3), it is necessary to interpret the language of appealed                                           
                      independent claims 1 and 19, drawn to product and method, respectively,5 by giving the                                      
                      claim terms their broadest reasonable interpretation consistent with the written description                                
                      provided in appellants’ specification as it would be interpreted by one of ordinary skill in                                
                      this art, see In re Morris, 127 F.3d 1048, 054-55, 44 USPQ2d 1023, 1027 (Fed. Cir. 1997);                                   
                      In re Zletz, 893 F.2d 319, 321-22, 13 USPQ2d 1320, 1322 (Fed. Cir. 1989), without                                           
                      reading into these claims any limitation or particular embodiment which is disclosed in the                                 
                      specification.  See Morris, supra; Zletz, supra; In re Priest, 582 F.2d 33, 37, 199 USPQ                                    
                      11, 15 (CCPA 1978).                                                                                                         
                      Appealed product claim 1 is copied above (see p. 5).  Appealed method claim 19,                                             
                      as it stands of record,6 reads as follows:                                                                                  
                      19.  A method for manufacturing a multi-layer polymeric shrink film comprising the steps                                    
                      of                                                                                                                          
                      (a)  coextruding a first skin layer comprising a polymer, a core layer comprising                                           
                      polypropylene, a polymeric modifier, and a hydrocarbon resin, and a second skin                                             
                      layer comprising a polymer;                                                                                                 
                      (b)  stretching the film of step (a) in the machine direction (MD) at a temperature                                         
                      of              105/C or less; and                                                                                          

                      5  Appellants group the appealed claims along product and method lines, wherein the                                         
                      claims of each group “stand or fall together” (brief, page 3).  Thus, I have considered                                     
                      appealed claims 1 and 19 as representative of the respective groups.  37 CFR §                                              
                      1.192(c)(7) (2003); see also 37 CFR  § 41.37(c)(1)(vii) (effective September 13, 2004;                                      
                      69 Fed. Reg. 49960 (August 12, 2004); 1286 Off. Gaz. Pat. Office 21 (September 7,                                           
                      2004)).                                                                                                                     
                      6  See the amendment filed June 23, 2003.                                                                                   

                                                                       23                                                                         





Page:  Previous  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007