Ex Parte Migliorini et al - Page 28




                      Appeal No. 2004-2292                                                                                                        
                      Application 09/747,537                                                                                                      

                      listed “polyolefins, vinylidene chloride copolymers , polyesters, polyamides and/or                                         
                      polycarbonates, as generically described above.”                                                                            
                              I note in this respect that, as appellant Migliorini points out in his declaration (¶¶                              
                      5-7), polyolefin layers in films are known in the art to adhere to each other, and indeed,                                  
                      neither Schloegl nor Peiffer discloses that the polyolefin films disclosed therein exhibit                                  
                      low adhesion between the polyolefin layers thereof, regardless of the nature of the                                         
                      polyolefin(s) in the layer.  The examiner’s argument to the contrary in the answer (pages                                   
                      16-17) is based on the bare statement in the advisory action mailed March 9, 2004, that                                     
                      “the prior art indicates that oriented isotactic polypropylene films are known to exhibit                                   
                      poor adhesion to heat sealing layers, such as polyethylene compositions, due to their non-                                  
                      polar character and high degree of orientation” (page 2).  Indeed, as appellants point out in                               
                      reply (reply brief, pages 1-2), the examiner has not established that this condition exists                                 
                      with the films of Schloegl and Peiffer, and has not cited any prior art in support of the                                   
                      position.                                                                                                                   
                      Therefore, I find that the record before this panel does not contain substantial                                            
                      evidence supporting the position of the examiner in the grounds of rejection based on the                                   
                      combined teachings of Schloegl and Blemberg and the combined teachings of Peiffer and                                       
                      Blemberg, and thus, I am of the opinion that the examiner has not made out a prima facie                                    
                      case of obviousness within the meaning of § 103(a) in these rejections.                                                     
                      However, I find that the combined teachings of Schloegl and Blemberg and the                                                
                      combined teachings of Peiffer and Blemberg nonetheless establish that the claims against                                    
                      which the examiner applied this prior art establish a prima facie case of obviousness                                       
                      within the meaning of § 103(a).  Indeed, Blemberg would have disclosed to one of                                            
                      ordinary skill                                                                                                              
                      in this art multi-layer polymeric shrink film containing one or more “adhesive or tie” core                                 



                                                                       28                                                                         





Page:  Previous  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007