Appeal No. 2004-2304 Application No. 09/886,735 In view of the above, we determine that both the anticipation and obviousness rejections are well-founded. We need not discuss the other references of Rinkinen and Brunel in making this determination. Conclusion Each of the rejections is affirmed. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a)(1)(iv)(effective September 13, 2004; 69 Fed. Reg. 49960 (August 12, 2004); 1286 Off. Gaz. Pat. Office 21 (September 7, 2004)). AFFIRMED CATHERINE TIMM ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) )BOARD OF PATENT ) APPEALS AND JEFFREY T. SMITH ) INTERFERENCES Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) ) BEVERLY A. PAWLIKOWSKI ) Administrative Patent Judge ) BAP/sld 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007