Ex Parte Yang et al - Page 2




                Appeal No. 2005-0116                                                                                                       
                Application No. 10/109,390                                                                                                 

                        Appellants’ invention relates to a method and apparatus for KTC noise canceling                                    
                in a linear CMOS image sensor.  An understanding of the invention can be derived from                                      
                a reading of exemplary claim 1, which is reproduced below.                                                                 
                        1.      A method of reading out a pixel signal from a pixel comprising:                                            
                        capturing a first black reference signal from said pixel prior to said                                             
                                pixel starting an integration period;                                                                      
                        after completion of said integration period, capturing a pixel signal;                                             
                        capturing a second black reference signal following completion of                                                  
                                said integration period; and                                                                               
                        outputting said first black reference signal, said second black                                                    
                                reference signal, and said pixel signal and using both said                                                
                                first black reference signal and said second black reference                                               
                                signal to modify said pixel signal.                                                                        
                        The prior art of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the appealed                                      
                claims is as follows:                                                                                                      
                Fossum et al. (Fossum)                           5,471,515                        Nov. 28, 1995                            
                Merrill et al. (Merrill)                         5,962,844                        Oct.  05, 1999                           
                                                                                         (filed Sep. 03, 1997)                             
                Booth, Jr.                                       6,078,037                        Jun. 20, 2000                            
                                                                                         (filed Apr. 16, 1998)                             
                Dhuse et al. (Dhuse)                             6,133,862                        Oct. 17, 2000                            
                                                                                         (filed Jul. 31, 1998)                             
                Gowda et al. (Gowda)                             6,344,877                        Feb. 05, 2002                            
                                                                                         (filed Jun. 12, 1997)                             






                                                                    2                                                                      





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007