Appeal No. 2005-0116
Application No. 10/109,390
independent claim 6 and dependent claims 7-9. Nor do we find that the teachings of
Merrill remedy the noted deficiencies of the above combination. Therefore, we cannot
sustain the rejection of claims 6-10.
CONCLUSION
To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 3-10 under
35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed, and the decision of the examiner to reject claims 1 and 2
under 35 U.S.C. § 102 is reversed
REVERSED
ERROL A. KRASS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JOSEPH L. DIXON ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
ALLEN R. MACDONALD )
Administrative Patent Judge )
JLD/vsh
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007