Appeal No. 2005-0157 Application No. 09/977,363 The examiner relies upon the following reference as evidence of obviousness: Tsuji et al. (JP ‘906) JP 07-230906 Aug. 29, 1995 Appellants’ claimed invention is directed to preparing a rare earth metal-based permanent magnet comprising the formation of a metal oxide film which contains carbon on the surface of the magnet by a sol-gel coating process. Appealed claims 9, 10 and 14-17 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over JP ‘609. Appellants group the appealed claims as follows: I. Claims 9, 10, 14 and 15; II. Claims 16 and 17. Accordingly, claims 10, 14 and 15 stand or fall together with claim 9, and claim 17 stands or falls together with claim 16. We have thoroughly reviewed each of appellants’ arguments for patentability. However, we are in complete agreement with the examiner that the claimed subject matter would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art within the meaning 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007