Ex Parte Kim - Page 1



            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
                   for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.         


                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Ex parte SUNG-SOO KIM                                
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 2005-0182                                 
                              Application No. 09/783,392                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                       ON BRIEF                                       
                                     ____________                                     
          Before WARREN, OWENS, and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.              
          WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         

                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is a decision on an appeal from the primary examiner’s            
          final rejection of claims 1 through 7, 9 and 10.1  Claim 8 is the           
          only other claim pending in this application and stands withdrawn           
          from further consideration as directed to a non-elected invention           
          (Brief, page 2, ¶(III); final Office action dated Mar. 11, 2003,            
          page 1).  We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.                 


               1Claims 5 and 8 were amended to correct informalities in an            
          amendment subsequent to the final rejection (see the amendment              
          dated Sep. 11, 2003, entered as per the Advisory Action dated               
          Oct. 2, 2003; and the Brief, page 2, ¶(IV)).                                




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007