The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte SUNG-SOO KIM ____________ Appeal No. 2005-0182 Application No. 09/783,392 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before WARREN, OWENS, and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal from the primary examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 through 7, 9 and 10.1 Claim 8 is the only other claim pending in this application and stands withdrawn from further consideration as directed to a non-elected invention (Brief, page 2, ¶(III); final Office action dated Mar. 11, 2003, page 1). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134. 1Claims 5 and 8 were amended to correct informalities in an amendment subsequent to the final rejection (see the amendment dated Sep. 11, 2003, entered as per the Advisory Action dated Oct. 2, 2003; and the Brief, page 2, ¶(IV)).Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007