Ex Parte Kim - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2005-0182                                                        
          Application No. 09/783,392                                                  

               According to appellant, the invention is directed to a seat            
          belt with a printed face at the outer side, where the printed face          
          is a character, a mark or a pattern which prevents the user’s hands         
          from slipping while maintaining the general function of the seat            
          belt (Brief, page 2).  Appellant states that the claims “are deemed         
          to be individually patentable” (Brief, page 3).  To the extent              
          appellant has presented specific, substantive arguments for the             
          patentability of individual claims, we will consider these claims           
          separately.  See 37 CFR § 1.192(c)(7)(2003); In re McDaniel, 293            
          F.3d 1379, 1383, 63 USPQ2d 1462, 1465 (Fed. Cir. 2002).                     
          Representative independent claim 1 is reproduced below:                     
          1.   A seat belt with a printed face for a vehicle, in which a              
          printed face of a character, a mark and a pattern is formed on one          
          face of the seat belt formed [sic] a band shape woven with                  
          polyester at a location selected to be grasped by a user when               
          fastening the seat belt, the printed face being embossed to prevent         
          slippage from the user’s grip and to facilitate the putting on and          
          taking off of the seat belt.                                                









                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007