Appeal No. 2005-0194 Page 2
Application No. 09/867,859
board batteries (specification, page 1). A copy of the claims under appeal is set forth in
the appendix to the appellant's brief.
The examiner relied upon the following prior art references of record in rejecting
the appealed claims:
Neidenberg 3,604,381 Sep. 14, 1971
Race 3,769,926 Nov. 6, 1973
Nilssen 5,510,694 Apr. 23, 1996
Edwards et al. (Edwards) 5,671,833 Sep. 30, 1997
McNaught 5,803,216 Sep. 8, 1998
Rubin 5,816,870 Oct. 6, 1998
Davidson 6,263,825 Jul. 24, 2001
(filed Feb. 1, 1999)
The following rejections are before us for review.
Claims 1-3, 9, 10, 13 and 16-18 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Rubin in view of Neidenberg.
Claims 4 and 5 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over
Rubin in view of Neidenberg and Davidson.
Claim 6 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Rubin
in view of Neidenberg and Nilssen.
Claims 7, 8, 14 and 15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Rubin in view of Neidenberg and Race.
Claims 11 and 12 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable
over Rubin in view of Neidenberg, McNaught and Edwards.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007