Ex Parte Jacobsen - Page 8



          Appeal No. 2005-0305                                                        
          Application No. 09/855,132                                                  

          ensuing discussion throughout the patent, the number of carriers            
          considered to be a maximum is also the same number (N).  The                
          detailed discussion of how the control circuitry 15 in figure 1             
          scales the number of carriers begins at column 5, line 58.  The             
          discussion at lines 60 through 62 teaches the control circuitry             
          15 scales the number of carriers by transmitting a subset of the            
          maximum number of carriers designed for the particular OFDM                 
          system, the emphasis being upon the use of the words                        
          transmitting and subset.  This is also discussed at column 6,               
          lines 10 through 18.  The example given at lines 12 through 17 is           
          significant when it states that “the N-points IFFT 16 can be                
          dynamically reduced to a X-points IFFT 16 where X < N.  In this             
          particular example, the IFFT 16 is designed to handle the end               
          carriers as the maximum number of carriers and dynamically scaled           
          to less than N carriers by performing an X-point IFFT 16.”                  
               It is thus clear to the artisan and to us that of the                  
          maximum number of N usable subcarriers in the “set of                       
          subcarriers” as set forth in claim 1 on appeal, the subset of               
          X subcarriers is actually utilized for performing X-point Inverse           
          Fast Fourier Transform mathematical operations in the same manner           
          as set forth in claim 1 on appeal.  It is thus clear as well from           
          the showing in figure 2 and the statement at column 6, lines 55             
                                          8                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007