Ex Parte Thompson - Page 3


               Appeal No. 2005-0319                                                                                                 
               Application No.  09/946,874                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                   
               obvious over Berlin in view of Stokes.  Throughout the opinion we make reference to                                  
               the briefs and the answer for the respective details thereof.                                                        
                                                               Opinion                                                              
                       We have carefully considered the subject matter on appeal, the rejections                                    
               advanced by the examiner and the evidence of anticipation and obviousness relied                                     
               upon by the examiner as support for the rejections.  We have, likewise, reviewed                                     
               and taken into consideration, in reaching our decision, the appellant’s arguments set                                
               forth in the briefs along with the examiner’s rationale in support of the rejections and                             
               arguments in rebuttal set forth in the examiner’s answer.                                                            
                       With full consideration being given to the subject matter on appeal, the                                     
               examiner’s rejections and the arguments of appellant and examiner, for the reasons                                   
               stated infra we will not sustain the examiner’s rejections of claims 1 through 9, 14                                 
               through 23, 28 through 37 and 42 under 35 U.S.C. § 102 or the examiner’s rejection                                   
               of claims 10 through 13, 24 through 27 and 38 through 41 under 35 U.S.C. § 103.                                      
                       We first consider the rejection of claims 1 through 7, 15 through 21 and 29                                  
               through 35 under 35 U.S.C. § 102.  Appellant argues on page 8 of the brief:                                          
                               With respect to the specific rejections of the Office Action, the cited                              
                       portions fail to describe the invention as claimed.  Berlin does describe a color                            
                       cube.  However, the Office Action relies on col. 10, lines 46-50 and col. 7,                                 
                       lines 20-34 to teach the claimed element of mapping a list of two or more                                    
                       color indices to a second color cube entry.  Nowhere in theses cited portions                                
                       is there any reference or description of multiple indices being mapped to a                                  
                       single color cube entry (as claimed).  In fact, col. 10 describes the exact                                  
                       opposite in filling in only one of a series of slots (see col. lines 10, 53-55                               
                       where every eighth slot is filled in) instead of two or more entries in each slot.                           
                       Col. 7, lines 20-34 further describes a cube where every eighth slot is filled in                            
                       for each color component.  Such a teaching clearly teaches away from                                         
                       mapping two or more color indices to a single entry as claimed.                                              


                                                               -3-                                                                  



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007