Appeal No. 2005-0319
Application No. 09/946,874
not asserted and we do not find that Stokes teaches this feature. Accordingly, we
will not sustain the examiner’s rejection of claims 10 through 13, 24 through 27 and
38 through 41.
In summary, we will not sustain the examiner’s rejections of claims 1 through
9, 14 through 23, 28 through 37 and 42 under 35 U.S.C. § 102 or the examiner’s
rejection of claims 10 through 13, 24 through 27 and 38 through 41 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103.
REVERSED
JOSEPH L. DIXON )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
)
STUART S. LEVY ) BOARD OF PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
ROBERT NAPPI )
Administrative Patent Judge )
RN/RWK
-7-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007