Ex Parte Gregel et al - Page 2




              Appeal No. 2005-0326                                                                Page 2                
              Application No. 10/081,376                                                                                



                                                   BACKGROUND                                                           
                     The appellants' invention relates generally to a reinforcing bar connection, and                   
              more particularly to a high strength reinforcing bar splice which provides not only high                  
              tensile and compressive strengths, but also has the dynamic or fatigue characteristics to                 
              qualify as a Type 2 coupler approved for all earthquake zones in the United States                        
              (specification, p. 1).  A copy of the claims under appeal is set forth in the appendix to                 
              the appellants' brief.                                                                                    


                     The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the                    
              appealed claims are:                                                                                      
              Dobell                             US 2,781,658                       Feb. 19, 1957                       
              Lande                              GB 2 034 857 A                     June 11, 1980                       
              Schade et al.                      DD 222 374 A12                     May 15, 1985                        
              (Schade)                                                                                                  
              Kadota                             GB 2 192 210 A                     Jan. 6, 1988                        


                     Claims 1 to 3 and 13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                                 
              unpatentable over Schade in view of Dobell.                                                               


                     2 In determining the teachings of Schade, we will rely on the translation provided by the appellants
              as Appendix C to their brief.                                                                             









Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007