Ex Parte Gregel et al - Page 7

                  Appeal No. 2005-0326                                                                                        Page 7                      
                  Application No. 10/081,376                                                                                                              



                  regarding claim 1.4   According, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 4 to 12, 20                                              
                  to 22 and 26 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.                                                                                         


                                                                  CONCLUSION                                                                              
                           To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 1 to 13, 20 to 22 and                                              
                  26 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.                                                                                                   
                                                                    REVERSED                                                                              





                                             CHARLES E. FRANKFORT                                  )                                                      
                                             Administrative Patent Judge                           )                                                      
                                                                                                   )                                                      
                                                                                                   )                                                      
                                                                                                   )                                                      
                                                                                                   ) BOARD OF PATENT                                      
                                             JOHN P. McQUADE                                       )         APPEALS                                      
                                             Administrative Patent Judge                           )              AND                                     
                                                                                                   )   INTERFERENCES                                      
                                                                                                   )                                                      
                                                                                                   )                                                      
                                                                                                   )                                                      
                                             JEFFREY V. NASE                                       )                                                      
                                             Administrative Patent Judge                           )                                                      

                           4 The rejection of independent method claim 20 is deficient for the reasons set forth above                                    
                  regarding claim 1.                                                                                                                      








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007