Ex Parte Walker et al - Page 6

                  Appeal No. 2005-0335                                                                                        Page 6                      
                  Application No. 09/569,645                                                                                                              


                  and Hurst.  We thus also cannot sustain the rejection of claim 7 as being unpatentable                                                  
                  over the AAPA in view of Hurst and Burgess.                                                                                             
                                                                  CONCLUSION                                                                              
                           To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 1-4, 7, 10, 13, 14                                                 
                  and 19 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.                                                                                               
                                                                    REVERSED                                                                              





                                             JOHN P. MCQUADE                                       )                                                      
                                             Administrative Patent Judge                           )                                                      
                                                                                                   )                                                      
                                                                                                   )                                                      
                                                                                                   )                                                      
                                                                                                   ) BOARD OF PATENT                                      
                                             JEFFREY V. NASE                                       )     APPEALS                                          
                                             Administrative Patent Judge                           )       AND                                            
                                                                                                   )  INTERFERENCES                                       
                                                                                                   )                                                      
                                                                                                   )                                                      
                                                                                                   )                                                      
                                             JENNIFER D. BAHR                                      )                                                      
                                             Administrative Patent Judge                           )                                                      














Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007