The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 12
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MING C. HAO, UMESHWAR DAYAL, MEICHUN HSU, DANIEL A. KEIM,
ADRIAN KRUG, and JULIAN LADISCH
____________
Appeal No. 2005-0433
Application No. 09/982,481
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before BARRY, LEVY, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges.
BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final
rejection of claims 1-32, which are all the claims in the application.
We affirm-in-part, and enter a new ground of rejection in accordance with
37 CFR § 41.50(b).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007