Ex Parte Hao et al - Page 2




              Appeal No. 2005-0433                                                                                         
              Application No. 09/982,481                                                                                   

                                                    BACKGROUND                                                             
                     The invention relates to placement of data for visualization of multidimensional                      
              data sets.  Representative claim 1 is reproduced below.                                                      
                     1.     A method for arranging data, said method comprising:                                           
                            receiving said data comprising a plurality of records, each said record                        
                     having a plurality of attributes;                                                                     
                            determining a set of attributes selected from said plurality of attributes,                    
                     said set of attributes for placement of said plurality of records in a graphically                    
                     displayable array, said graphically displayable array comprising a plurality of                       
                     adjacent data points, each said data point representing one record of said                            
                     plurality of records;                                                                                 
                            arranging said plurality of records to construct said graphically displayable                  
                     array so that each of said adjacent data points is assigned a record.                                 
                     The examiner relies on the following reference:                                                       
              Tabei et al. (Tabei)                       5,929,863                    Jul. 27, 1999                        
                     Claims 1-30 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as being anticipated by Tabei.                       
                     Claims 31 and 32 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable                           
              over Tabei.                                                                                                  
                     We refer to the Final Rejection (Paper No. 7) and the Examiner’s Answer (Paper                        
              No. 10) for a statement of the examiner’s position and to the Brief (Paper No. 9) for                        
              appellants’ position with respect to the claims which stand rejected.                                        






                                                            -2-                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007