Ex Parte Hua et al - Page 3



          Appeal No. 2005-0440                                                        
          Application No. 09/994,075                                                  

          Schumacher et al.        0 608 687 A1        Aug. 03, 1994                  
               (EP ’687)(published EP                                                 
                application)                                                          
          Drummond                WO 96/20308         Jul. 04, 1996                  
               (WO ’308)(published PCT                                                
                application)                                                          
               The appealed claims stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)            
          as follows:                                                                 
               I. claims 1 through 7, 10, and 20 through 25 as                        
                    unpatentable over WO ’308 in view of Eckert or Evans              
                    (answer at 3-4);                                                  
               II. claim 8 as unpatentable over WO ’308 in view of Eckert             
                    or Evans and further in view of Tsukamoto (id. at 4);             
               III. claim 9 as unpatentable over WO ’308 in view of Eckert            
                    or Evans and further in view of Nye or EP ’687 (id.);             
               IV. claim 12 as unpatentable over WO ’308 in view of                   
                    Eckert or Evans and further in view of the appellants’            
                    admitted prior art (id. at 5);                                    
               V. claims 1 through 8, 10, and 20 through 25 as                        
                    unpatentable over Hovey in view of Tsukamoto (id. at              
                    5-6);                                                             
               VI. claim 9 as unpatentable over Hovey in view of                      
                    Tsukamoto and further in view of Nye or EP ’687 (id.              
                    at 6);                                                            

                                          3                                           


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007